pi hr logo
Request a Demo
Blogs

Boomerang Hiring Costs: Prevent Regretted Backfills

HR Strategy and Planning

Preventing boomerang hiring costs in January

boomerang main image

Key Takeaways

Frame 1321318103

Boomerangs can plug gaps fast, but they’ve surged and aren’t automatically cheaper. In March 2025, nearly two-thirds of new information-sector hires were boomerangs, according to ADP Research.

Frame 1321318103

Treat boomerangs as a symptom. Fix root causes like pay compression and manager effectiveness rather than using boomerangs as a strategy.

Frame 1321318103

Segment offers: fast returners, 12 months or less away, need friction fixes; long returners, more than 12 months, need disciplined pricing that does not crowd out internal mobility.

Frame 1321318103

Reduce future boomerangs by boosting internal moves — companies committed to internal mobility see employees stay about 60 percent longer.

Boomerang hires (rehiring former employees) can patch gaps fast, but they often mask preventable churn and hidden costs. In 2025, boomerangs were a notable share of hiring. ADP Research found that in March 2025 the pattern was especially stark in the information sector, where nearly two-thirds of new hires were returning employees; even across the broader labor market, boomerang activity has risen versus prior years. That’s a sign many companies are paying, again, for talent they once had.

Why boomerangs feel attractive (and why they’re not automatically a bargain)

Boomerang hires ramp faster and already know your stack and culture. But they’re not free. You still incur recruiting time, onboarding, and opportunity cost. Even using conservative references, SHRM pegs average cost-per-hire around $4,700, and that excludes lost productivity and project risk. A single regretted exit you could have prevented will wipe out months of “savings” from rehiring familiarity. 

Media and analyst coverage has highlighted the boomerang uptick beyond one sector, with estimates that boomerangs comprised roughly a third of new hires in some snapshots, again, evidence of the trend rather than definitive target rates. Treat boomerangs as a symptom of upstream issues you can influence. Such as career growth, manager effectiveness, fair pay.

Two boomerang patterns—manage them differently

Fast returners (≤12 months away

Often a “grass wasn’t greener” case. If you rehire, fix the original friction (manager fit, scope, schedule) or history will repeat.

”Long

Typically strategic re-acquisitions after a career pivot. Price appropriately; don’t displace internal mobility.

In both cases, the cheapest boomerang is the one you never need because you retained the person before they ever left.

How to reduce Q1 boomerang spend by preventing regret exits (Visibility + Speed to Value)

Focus on three upstream levers you can act on in Q4:

Frame 1321318103

Targeted compression fixes.

Use peer-based pay comparisons post-merit to identify employees whose compensation has drifted below internal bands; these focused adjustments are often cheaper than replacements. 

Frame 1321318103

Manager enablement.

Because managers drive ~70% of engagement variance, a weak or changing manager relationship is a leading indicator. Give managers “stay-conversation” prompts and concrete offers. 

Price the decision like a CFO

Publish a simple rehire-vs-retain comparison for leadership:

Expected replacement cost per role: use $4,700 as the conservative SHRM baseline, then add ramp risk for critical roles.

Retention toolkit cost: budget envelopes for targeted adjustments, internal move incentives, and manager development time.

ROI story: “We ran a December save sprint on 35 high-risk employees; 18 stayed. Using the $4,700 baseline, we avoided ~$84k in hiring costs before productivity gains.”

This turns a feel-good story into a financial one: we didn’t just welcome them back; we prevented the cost in the first place.

Build a clean boomerang policy

You’re not banning boomerangs; you’re professionalizing them:

Frame 1321318103

Eligibility windows (e.g., minimum tenure and performance at exit).

Frame 1321318103

Level and pay rules to keep internal equity intact.

Frame 1321318103

Reboarding expectations so returners re-integrate with today’s processes and culture.

A clear policy keeps rehiring strategic, reserved for true talent re-acquisitions, not a reflex that hides retention problems.

What to track monthly

Frame 1321318103

Regret rate (share of voluntary exits you wish you’d kept).

Frame 1321318103

Boomerang share of new hires by org and role type.

Frame 1321318103

Savings from prevention (avoidance dollars vs. targeted investments).

Frame 1321318103

Time-to-productivity of boomerangs vs. internal movers—often a wash when internal mobility is healthy.

Where PeopleInsight Essentials fits

PeopleInsight Essentials gives lean HR teams one place to see mobility, manager, and pay signals all in one clear dashboard, in a way that quantifies the risk and the ROI of prevention. It’s designed for teams with messy data and no analyst bench—fast to value and priced so a single prevented backfill covers it. With 5-day implementation, you could identify and optimize boomerang levers in a week’s time.

Bottom line: Boomerangs have their place, but preventing the regretted exit that creates the vacancy is almost always cheaper, faster, and better for your culture.

Prevent even one regretted backfill and you’ve paid for PeopleInsight Essentials.

Request a demo to see pricing and how we stand you up fast.