pi hr logo
Request a Demo
Blogs

Year-End Attrition: Spot December Risk Before It Spikes

HR Strategy and Planning

Year-end attrition spikes: will you see it coming?

Year End Attrition Illustration

Key Takeaways

Frame 1321318103

December exits are predictable, monitor a few leading signals months ahead (time since last move, recent manager change, pay compression, workload.

Frame 1321318103

Stand up a lightweight “risk radar”, so managers can intervene early.

Frame 1321318103

Equip managers with a simple playbook tied to each signal.

Frame 1321318103

Prove impact in January with saves vs. last year and avoided backfills; use a conservative cost-per-hire baseline to show dollars saved.

If December resignations blindside you, you pay for it in January. The people you lose right as next year’s plans kick off are often the ones you can least afford to replace: institutional knowledge, customer relationships, and critical skills walk out the door just as headcount plans, performance cycles, and budgets reset. The national quits rate has cooled from “Great Resignation” highs, but it’s still meaningful, 1.9% in August 2025, and that’s an average masking pockets of volatility by industry and region. If your leadership team is surprised by a year-end spike, your credibility takes the first hit, followed quickly by your budget.

Why spikes happen (even when the market cools)

Year-end exits are rarely random. They’re the compounded result of calendar driven triggers: bonus timing, merit cycles, new budgets. Plus team shifts, manager changes, reorganizations, and months of unmet needs in career mobility, pay fairness, and workload.

External markets set the backdrop, but local drivers dominate. Even in a cooler market, decision windows cluster around holidays and planning season; job seekers and employers both tend to make moves early in Q1 after budgets reset, which is why you see fresh openings and movement in the new year.

Here’s the uncomfortable truth: if you only “discover” a spike when notice letters arrive, you’ve already missed the saving window. The cost of missing early signals isn’t abstract. Gallup has estimated voluntary turnover costs U.S. businesses about $1 trillion annually, with replacement costs often ½–2× annual salary per employee. Even if your CFO debates the exact multiple, no one argues that last-minute backfills are cheap or painless.

The early-warning signals most teams can see (but don’t use)

You don’t need a data science team to get predictive. You need a short list of leading indicators you can refresh monthly:

Tenure cliffs (12/24/36 months): Employees often re-evaluate at anniversaries.

Career velocity: time since last move or promotion; lack of movement is repeatedly linked to attrition, while internal mobility lengthens tenure. LinkedIn’s research shows companies strong in internal mobility retain people ~60% longer.

Manager volatility: a change in manager within the last 60–90 days. Gallup’s work shows managers explain ~70% of the variance in engagement—when that relationship wobbles, so does retention.

Pay fairness: compression vs. peers after merit cycles or vs. market midpoints; compensation concerns remain a top driver of quits.

Workload balance: prolonged overtime, unused PTO, or schedule instability.

Internal application signals: attempts to move that stalled out.

Hiring-market pull: sudden offer activity for your hot skills.

You likely have these data crumbs already (HRIS, ATS, payroll, LMS). The problem isn’t collection, it’s stitching and refresh cadence.

Build a “December risk radar” in 10 working days (Speed to Value)

If you’re light on analytics support, use a pragmatic build:

Extract & join:

K

 pull core tables (people, manager mapping, job history, comp events, PTO, ATS stages) and join on person ID.

Score 1 point for each item that’s true:

K

It’s been 24+ months since their last role change or move.

K

They had a manager change in the last 90 days.

K

Their pay is more than 10% below the peer median.

K

They repeatedly carry over unused PTO or have an ongoing overtime streak.

Flag the exceptions:

K

any employee scoring 2+ goes on a manager-action list.

Publish one page:

K
“Where we’ll likely spike” (org/location/job family), top drivers, and recommended actions.

The point isn’t perfect prediction; it’s creating a two-week lead time for targeted conversations, offers, and internal moves before bonuses hit and recruiters pounce.

Data becomes action only when managers can see exactly who is at risk and why.

Equip each leader with:

Frame 1321318103

A team-level heatmap of risk (red = 2+ signals).

Frame 1321318103

The two signals that qualified each person (e.g., “20 months since any move + manager change in Oct”).

Frame 1321318103

A playbook matched to cause: mobility (surface two internal paths), pay (compression quick-fix rules), workload (rebalancing), recognition (sponsorship, visibility).

Document the logic in plain language so it survives first contact with skeptical leaders. Credibility comes from transparency, not a black box.

Prove the impact in January

Measure and publish:

December quits rate vs. last year (overall and by hot-spot teams).

Save rate among flagged employees (and 90/180-day follow-through).

Backfill avoided: how many roles didn’t open because you intervened.

Dollar impact: even if you use conservative math (e.g., SHRM’s widely referenced $4,700 average cost-per-hire baseline), one prevented replacement often pays for the whole effort.

Tie your results to the external context so finance and the C-suite can calibrate: quits may be down from 2022 highs, but the national rate still sits at 1.9%, and your hot spots can deviate materially from that average.

Common objections (and how to answer them)

“We don’t have clean data.”

You don’t need perfect, just consistent. Start with what you can trust, and add signals over time.

“We can’t afford counter-offers.”

Not every save is cash. Many are about mobility, scope, or schedule. When pay is the issue, compare the cost of a targeted adjustment to a full replacement cycle. 

“We already do exit interviews.”

Great, but those are retrospective and prone to recall and social-desirability bias. You need leading indicators, not just a tidy post-mortem. 

Where PeopleInsight Essentials fits

If this sounds valuable but heavy, Essentials was built for HR teams without an analyst bench. It consolidates your HR and TA data, and ships executive-ready monthly reports that highlight trend shifts and root causes so you can act quickly. In other words, speed to value and stakeholder visibility without a BI project. Plus, with dashboards up and running in just 5 days, you could have your “December risk radar” report ready to share with leadership before it’s too late.

Bottom line: A December spike doesn’t have to be a surprise. Build a lightweight risk radar now and turn January into a retention win instead of a scramble.

Ready to spot December risk in days, not months? Request a PeopleInsight Essentials demo and see a 10-minute walkthrough of the executive report and AI insights. We’ll show you how fast you can get live on your data.